Most Popular
-
1
Actor Jung Woo-sung admits to being father of model Moon Ga-bi’s child
-
2
Wealthy parents ditch Korean passports to get kids into international school
-
3
Man convicted after binge eating to avoid military service
-
4
First snow to fall in Seoul on Wednesday
-
5
Final push to forge UN treaty on plastic pollution set to begin in Busan
-
6
Korea to hold own memorial for forced labor victims, boycotting Japan’s
-
7
Nvidia CEO signals Samsung’s imminent shipment of AI chips
-
8
Industry experts predicts tough choices as NewJeans' ultimatum nears
-
9
Job creation lowest on record among under-30s
-
10
NK troops disguised as 'indigenous' people in Far East for combat against Ukraine: report
[Other View] Trump's tough talk meets bloody reality in Mosul
By Korea HeraldPublished : March 29, 2017 - 17:41
It’s easy to call for destroying the Islamic State group, as President Donald Trump does to thunderous applause from his supporters.
But our new commander in chief is learning how difficult and bloody war can be -- and he’s starting to stray dangerously close to deepening American involvement in intractable wars.
The US military is investigating whether its weapons killed as many as 200 civilians in Mosul, where a March 17 airstrike was called in by Iraqi troops targeting Islamic State group fighters and equipment. It’s possible that the civilians were being used as human shields. If confirmed, it would be the deadliest civilian incident in the two-year coalition air campaign in Iraq and Syria and one of the worst ever for the US military.
Defense Secretary James Mattis said Monday the military does “everything humanly possible to reduce the loss of life or injury among innocent people. The same cannot be said for our adversaries.”
The Pentagon, however, does not plan to change the way it conducts airstrikes, even as the fighting enters more densely populated urban areas. It should at least take a second look. The United Nations is warning that the worst is to come in Mosul, where an estimated 400,000 are trapped.
To retake Mosul from the Islamic State group, the president has ordered 200 more US soldiers into the fight and has allowed them to go closer to the front lines to support Iraqi forces. About 5,000 US troops are already in Iraq.
Trump is also sending 400 more soldiers into Syria to prepare for the battle for Raqqa, the capital of the Islamic State group’s self-proclaimed caliphate. That would nearly double US forces in the middle of that civil war. The Pentagon is also looking into reports of more than 60 civilian deaths in two recent airstrikes near Raqqa that hit a mosque and a school.
The incidents should cause the White House to think twice about loosening the rules of engagement, designed to prevent civilian casualties and imposed by the Obama administration for drone strikes, commando raids and other counterterrorism missions outside war zones. Trump has granted a Pentagon request for the looser rules in three provinces of Yemen. That allowed the January special forces raid during which a Navy SEAL and several civilians were killed.
In January, Trump directed his national security team to come up with a comprehensive strategy against the Islamic State group. Full details have not been released, but US military action is already ramping up in Syria and Iraq. If Trump thought the blowback to taking away people’s health insurance was bad, he’d better not send thousands more Americans into battle.
(The Sacramento Bee)
But our new commander in chief is learning how difficult and bloody war can be -- and he’s starting to stray dangerously close to deepening American involvement in intractable wars.
The US military is investigating whether its weapons killed as many as 200 civilians in Mosul, where a March 17 airstrike was called in by Iraqi troops targeting Islamic State group fighters and equipment. It’s possible that the civilians were being used as human shields. If confirmed, it would be the deadliest civilian incident in the two-year coalition air campaign in Iraq and Syria and one of the worst ever for the US military.
Defense Secretary James Mattis said Monday the military does “everything humanly possible to reduce the loss of life or injury among innocent people. The same cannot be said for our adversaries.”
The Pentagon, however, does not plan to change the way it conducts airstrikes, even as the fighting enters more densely populated urban areas. It should at least take a second look. The United Nations is warning that the worst is to come in Mosul, where an estimated 400,000 are trapped.
To retake Mosul from the Islamic State group, the president has ordered 200 more US soldiers into the fight and has allowed them to go closer to the front lines to support Iraqi forces. About 5,000 US troops are already in Iraq.
Trump is also sending 400 more soldiers into Syria to prepare for the battle for Raqqa, the capital of the Islamic State group’s self-proclaimed caliphate. That would nearly double US forces in the middle of that civil war. The Pentagon is also looking into reports of more than 60 civilian deaths in two recent airstrikes near Raqqa that hit a mosque and a school.
The incidents should cause the White House to think twice about loosening the rules of engagement, designed to prevent civilian casualties and imposed by the Obama administration for drone strikes, commando raids and other counterterrorism missions outside war zones. Trump has granted a Pentagon request for the looser rules in three provinces of Yemen. That allowed the January special forces raid during which a Navy SEAL and several civilians were killed.
In January, Trump directed his national security team to come up with a comprehensive strategy against the Islamic State group. Full details have not been released, but US military action is already ramping up in Syria and Iraq. If Trump thought the blowback to taking away people’s health insurance was bad, he’d better not send thousands more Americans into battle.
(The Sacramento Bee)
-
Articles by Korea Herald
