PARIS (AFP) ― Low interest rates are stoking the fires of takeovers, with about a quarter of big groups now on the lookout for targets in the next 12 months, a study found this week.
The signs are clear “that plans for transformational acquisitions are accelerating,” the survey by consultancy EY concluded.
The pharmaceutical sector has led the way so far this year with deals worth $150 billion, according to consultancy Dealogic, and that does not include a failed bid worth $117 billion by U.S. firm Pfizer for British-Swedish group AstraZeneca.
On Friday, a bid worth $46 billion or 33.7 billion euros by U.S. drugs laboratory AbbVie was rejected by Shire Pharmaceuticals which is listed in London and New York but based in Dublin.
On Wednesday, U.S. group Valeant launched a hostile bid of $53.5 billion for Allergan.
Much of this is driven by a need to grow and cut costs to counter the expiry of some patents on high-earning drugs, analysts say.
The survey assessment by EY backs up comments from analysts for some time that ultra-low interest rates by several leading central banks is one of the main factors re-lighting interest in takeovers.
Other forces are at work as well: During the financial crisis which began in 2008, and the subsequent eurozone debt crisis, many big companies restructured their businesses and hoarded cash.
They did not have sufficient confidence in the outlook to invest, even by borrowing cheap money being pushed at the banking system by some central banks.
But now many businesses are gaining confidence in the recovery and are looking to expand by buying other businesses: this can offer a faster route to growth than setting up new operations, and may be less risky.
EY interviewed 1,600 executives in companies in 54 countries. It found that the number of big groups willing to launch takeovers of than $500 million had doubled in 12 months to 27 percent of the total. Those willing to do deals of more than $1 billion had doubled to 12 percent.
Their willingness to take on debt to finance deals was the highest for five years.
Many companies are under pressure from aggressive shareholders to cut costs, and this could make company boards highly selective in looking at targets.
“After a prolonged financial crisis and MandA market malaise, companies and boards are opting for quality rather than quantity,” commented the head of merger and acquisition activity in France for EY, Rudy Cohen Scali.
Recently U.S. and European companies have led M&A activity, but emerging companies could begin to play a significant role, led by China and India, the report said.
“The top five investment destinations balance emerging markets such as India and China, with a continued focus on mature markets such as the U.S., U.K. and Germany,” it found.
The EY report said that “30 percent of executives perceive global political instability to be the greatest economic risk.”
Data from Henderson Global Investors last month showed that in the first quarter of the year big companies had raise dividend payouts to shareholders by nearly a third.
With the crises fading, and despite sluggish growth “all over the markets there is liquidity waiting to be used,” a portfolio manager at Barclays Bourse in Paris, Renaud Murail said then.
“American companies have accumulated huge war chests,” he said.
At investment group Amundi, the global head of equities Romain Boscher, commented at the time: “The wave of mergers and acquisitions is just beginning.”
Cohen Scali said in the EY report this week: “The fundamentals for high-value deal-making are very favorable ... However, the complexity of the challenge facing executives today means MandA is more measured.”
Michael Hewson, chief market analyst at CMC Markets U.K., contested suggestions that the upsurge of MandA activity reflects renewed confidence in some parts of the global economy, saying that one driving factor was a search by U.S. companies to use their piles of cash abroad in a way which would not attract tax if the money were sent to headquarters in the United States.
Pfizer’s failed attempt to acquire AstraZeneca “was the most high profile attempt” to use cash, he said. With many stock markets close to record high levels, boardrooms were considering buying back their own shares, or returning reserves to shareholders ― citing Rolls-Royce this week as the latest example of this.
Attempts by U.S. group General Electric to buy a large part of French engineering group Alstom could also be motivated in part by the fact that it had $57 billion outside the United States at the end of last year, he said.
The signs are clear “that plans for transformational acquisitions are accelerating,” the survey by consultancy EY concluded.
The pharmaceutical sector has led the way so far this year with deals worth $150 billion, according to consultancy Dealogic, and that does not include a failed bid worth $117 billion by U.S. firm Pfizer for British-Swedish group AstraZeneca.
On Friday, a bid worth $46 billion or 33.7 billion euros by U.S. drugs laboratory AbbVie was rejected by Shire Pharmaceuticals which is listed in London and New York but based in Dublin.
On Wednesday, U.S. group Valeant launched a hostile bid of $53.5 billion for Allergan.
Much of this is driven by a need to grow and cut costs to counter the expiry of some patents on high-earning drugs, analysts say.
The survey assessment by EY backs up comments from analysts for some time that ultra-low interest rates by several leading central banks is one of the main factors re-lighting interest in takeovers.
Other forces are at work as well: During the financial crisis which began in 2008, and the subsequent eurozone debt crisis, many big companies restructured their businesses and hoarded cash.
They did not have sufficient confidence in the outlook to invest, even by borrowing cheap money being pushed at the banking system by some central banks.
But now many businesses are gaining confidence in the recovery and are looking to expand by buying other businesses: this can offer a faster route to growth than setting up new operations, and may be less risky.
EY interviewed 1,600 executives in companies in 54 countries. It found that the number of big groups willing to launch takeovers of than $500 million had doubled in 12 months to 27 percent of the total. Those willing to do deals of more than $1 billion had doubled to 12 percent.
Their willingness to take on debt to finance deals was the highest for five years.
Many companies are under pressure from aggressive shareholders to cut costs, and this could make company boards highly selective in looking at targets.
“After a prolonged financial crisis and MandA market malaise, companies and boards are opting for quality rather than quantity,” commented the head of merger and acquisition activity in France for EY, Rudy Cohen Scali.
Recently U.S. and European companies have led M&A activity, but emerging companies could begin to play a significant role, led by China and India, the report said.
“The top five investment destinations balance emerging markets such as India and China, with a continued focus on mature markets such as the U.S., U.K. and Germany,” it found.
The EY report said that “30 percent of executives perceive global political instability to be the greatest economic risk.”
Data from Henderson Global Investors last month showed that in the first quarter of the year big companies had raise dividend payouts to shareholders by nearly a third.
With the crises fading, and despite sluggish growth “all over the markets there is liquidity waiting to be used,” a portfolio manager at Barclays Bourse in Paris, Renaud Murail said then.
“American companies have accumulated huge war chests,” he said.
At investment group Amundi, the global head of equities Romain Boscher, commented at the time: “The wave of mergers and acquisitions is just beginning.”
Cohen Scali said in the EY report this week: “The fundamentals for high-value deal-making are very favorable ... However, the complexity of the challenge facing executives today means MandA is more measured.”
Michael Hewson, chief market analyst at CMC Markets U.K., contested suggestions that the upsurge of MandA activity reflects renewed confidence in some parts of the global economy, saying that one driving factor was a search by U.S. companies to use their piles of cash abroad in a way which would not attract tax if the money were sent to headquarters in the United States.
Pfizer’s failed attempt to acquire AstraZeneca “was the most high profile attempt” to use cash, he said. With many stock markets close to record high levels, boardrooms were considering buying back their own shares, or returning reserves to shareholders ― citing Rolls-Royce this week as the latest example of this.
Attempts by U.S. group General Electric to buy a large part of French engineering group Alstom could also be motivated in part by the fact that it had $57 billion outside the United States at the end of last year, he said.
-
Articles by Korea Herald