Choi complains that he can’t even smoke from the window of his own apartment anymore because his neighbors next door or upstairs will complain about smoke coming in through their windows.

“I do understand people who do not smoke do not like to be around people who do, but that does not mean those who smoke must suffer,” he fumed. “Smoking certainly is not a crime.”

South Korea’s smoking rate for people aged 19 or older stood at 39.6 percent last year, down from 43.1 percent a year earlier but still way above the average of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development member nations, which recorded 27.3 percent in 2008.

South Korea hopes to bring its smoking rate down to the OECD level within the coming years.

Smokers in big cities like the capital Seoul face more difficulty in finding places to enjoy smoking.

Under its latest ordinance set to go into effect on March 1, the Seoul city government has designated 23 new public parks and 295 bus stops where smoking will be banned.

If you are caught smoking in the designated areas, you will be fined 100,000 won ($89), instead of a 30,000-won fine usually imposed on other smoking violations.

Smoking could become more expensive, too. Health Minister Chin Soo-hee recently suggested that cigarette prices must be doubled to 5,000 won ($4.60) a pack as part of efforts to discourage smoking.

She later backed down under angry reactions from smokers but insisted that she will find an appropriate price after consulting with the U.N. World Health Organization.

Smokers blame the government for first getting them hooked on smoking and now trying to tax them even more.

“If smoking is so bad and harmful, they should have just made it illegal a long time ago, especially when they are very aware how addictive smoking is,” said a manager of Freezon, an online community for smokers, previously called “ilovesmoking.”

“About half of the price of a cigarette is already tax and they want to impose more tax, claiming it will cut the smoking rate. The truth is it will have little effect on the smoking rate because people who smoke will continue to buy even at high prices, meaning they will only end up paying more tax.”

In addition, smokers in the country face added difficulties at the office, as many companies are advising, if not forcing, their workers to quit smoking or even choosing not to hire new employees who smoke.

Taihan Electric Wire Co., South Korea’s oldest and second-largest electric cable maker, recently launched a company-wide no-smoking campaign, offering a 350,000-won ($320) reward to anyone who agrees to quit, in addition to a free three-day vacation to anyone who succeeds in quitting.

Some companies are even more intent on having their employees quit smoking.

Hanwha Chemical Corp. recently launched a similar anti-smoking campaign that includes regular nicotine tests for workers who pledge to quit smoking. If an employee fails to show significant drops in nicotine levels, twice in a row, he or she must spend three days at a rehabilitation center at his or her own expense and vacation time.

“The no-smoking campaign not only promotes the health of workers but also helps create a better and cleaner environment for all employees, including those who smoke,” said Lee Jae-won, a public relations official of Kumho Asiana Group, which owns Asiana Airlines and Kumho Tire.

The group is a pioneer in corporate anti-smoking campaigns in South Korea. It began its no-smoking campaign in 1991 when South Korea did not even have its own regulations in place against smoking inside office buildings.

Most smokers or people who have recently quit smoking, either by choice or force, agree such anti-smoking campaigns being waged by some big companies are for the good of all people, including themselves. (Yonhap News)