정부는 22일 택시를 대중교통 수단으로 인정하 는 `대중교통 육성 및 이용촉진법'(택시법) 개정안을 거부하고, 대신 실질적 택시지 원 내용이 담긴 `택시운송사업 발전을 위한 지원법(택시지원법)'을 제정하기로 했다 .
그러나 택시업계가 정부의 거부권 행사에 강력 반발하며 파업 검토 등 비상대응 체제에 돌입하겠다고 밝혀 자칫 택시발(發) 교통대란이 발생할 가능성을 배제할 수 없게 됐다.
정부는 이날 세종로 정부서울청사에서 김황식 국무총리 주재로 국무회의를 열어 `택시법 공포안'과 `재의요구안(거부권 행사 안건)'을 심의한 뒤 재의요구안을 의결 했다.
임종룡 국무총리실장은 브리핑에서 "택시법은 입법취지와 법체계상 문제가 있다 "며 "`대중교통'이란 대량수송이 가능한 교통수단이 일정한 노선과 시간표를 갖고 운행하는 것을 의미하는데 택시는 이 범주에 포함될 수 없다"고 말했다.
이어 "교통혼잡 및 환경오염 방지, 에너지 절감 등 사회경제적 비용을 줄이려는 대중교통법의 입법 취지에도 부합하지 않다"며 "외국에서도 택시를 대중교통으로 인 정한 경우는 없다"고 설명했다.
또 "일정한 노선과 시간표를 갖추고 대량수송하는 여객선, 항공기와 통근ㆍ통학 용으로 제공되는 전세버스도 대중교통의 범위에서 제외하고 있어 유사 교통수단과 형평성 문제도 있다"고 강조했다.
이와 함께 "특히 대중교통 지원을 위한 재정부담의 대부분은 지자체가 부담하고 있어 국가와 지자체에 재정부담을 수반한다"고 덧붙였다.
임 실장은 "대통령이 재의요구안을 재가할 것으로 알고 있다"며 "오늘 중으로 재가를 하면 빠른 시일 내에 국회에 이송하겠다"고 말했다.
대신 정부는 택시산업 발전 종합대책을 담고 있는 택시지원법을 제정하기로 했 다.
택시지원법은 ▲재정지원 ▲총량제 실시 ▲구조조정 ▲운송비용 전가 금지와 장 시간 근로 방지 ▲택시 서비스 개선 ▲조세감면 ▲복지기금 조성 등의 내용을 담고 있다.
문제는 여야 모두 택시법을 재의결하겠다는 입장이어서 국회에서 재의결될 가능 성이 높다는 점이다.
재의결은 재적의원 과반수의 출석에 출석의원 3분의 2 이상 찬성을 요건으로 하 는데 국회는 국회의원 총수의 3분의 2를 훌쩍 넘긴 222명의 찬성으로 법안을 처리했 다.
택시업계는 정부의 택시지원법 대체 입법 추진에 강력 반발하고 있다.
택시업계는 "택시지원법을 신뢰할 수 없고, 택시지원법은 택시법 입법을 방해하 기 위한 술수에 불과하다"며 비상대응체제 돌입을 선언했다.
택시업계는 이날 4개 단체 대표자 회의를 열어 총파업 여부와 일정 등을 논의키 로 했으며, 총파업 결정을 내릴 경우 교통대란은 피할 수 없을 것으로 보인다.
<관련 영문 기사>
Lee, parliament collide over taxi bill
By Song Sang-ho
The government and lawmakers are on a collision course after President Lee Myung-bak on Tuesday vetoed a parliament-approved bill on the taxi business, which he criticized as a populist legislation giving unfair subsidies to the industry.
Both ruling and opposition parties denounced the rejection as tax operators threatened to strike.
At the Cabinet meeting presided over by Prime Minister Kim Hwang-sik, ministers decided to call on the National Assembly to reconsider and vote again on the bill, and instead enact a new law to support the taxi industry.
The bill calls for categorizing taxis as public transportation eligible for state subsidies. Officials and critics said that it would restrict welfare, defense and other crucial national budgets.
“Public transportation refers to modes of mass transport that have regular routes and time schedules. Thus, taxis can’t be included into the category (of public transportation),” said Lim Jong-ryong, minister of the Prime Minister’s Office, during a press briefing.
“(The bill) does not serve the purpose of the public transportation law, which is designed to curtail social and economic costs stemming from traffic congestion, environmental contamination and energy consumption.”
Adding that there are no countries that recognize taxis as mass transportation means, Lim stressed the bill could raise issues of “fairness” given that passenger ships, airplanes and chartered school buses are not designated as public transportation.
The Assembly passed the bill on Jan. 1 with 222 of the total 300 lawmakers endorsing it. Neither the ruling nor opposition parties spoke out against its downsides due to a possible backlash from some 300,000 cab drivers ahead of the presidential poll.
The government estimated that taxpayers’ money amounting to some 1 trillion won ($940 million) would be required each year to implement the legislation entailing the same state benefits currently granted to buses, trains and subways.
Calling the presidential move a “breach of social consensus,” the nationwide association of taxi operators decided to launch regional strikes in Seoul, Busan and Gwangju later this month and next month. It held an emergency working-level meeting to discuss details of their strikes.
The taxi union dismissed the new law to support the taxi industry as “unrealistic.” They stressed that although similar legislations have been proposed many times in the past, none of them have been put into practice.
The envisioned law the government announced on Tuesday includes offering financial support and tax benefits, setting up a welfare fund for them, and imposing a cap on the number of new taxi drivers to regulate the oversaturation of the taxi market.
The government underscored that the proposed law will help support taxi drivers whereas the rejected bill is largely to benefit the companies.
“The new law is to set up a welfare fund and has a provision to prevent (companies) to demand that drivers pay for the partial cost of purchasing and washing their cars,” Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs Vice Minister Joo Sung-ho told a press conference.
Both the ruling Saenuri Party and main opposition Democratic United Party are expected to take steps for a revote on the bill. Observers said that as more than two-thirds of the total lawmakers already approved of it in the initial vote, there might not be any critical hurdle for its passage.
Saenuri floor leader Rep. Lee Hahn-koo said that his party would first look into the government’s position and the newly proposed law. But he said that if the DUP pushed for the revote, the ruling party would accept it.
DUP floor leader Rep. Park Ki-choon called for an immediate revote over the bill.
“After candidate Park Geun-hye’s election victory, 222 lawmakers approved of the bill and virtually reached a social consensus on it. The presidential rejection breaks that consensus and only prompts conflict,” Park told reporters.
A parliamentary revote requires the approval from more than two-thirds of the lawmakers participating in the vote. More than half of the total 300 lawmakers should attend the revote. The president cannot reject the reapproved bill.
President-elect Park did not issue any comment on the politically sensitive issue. Her aides suggested the incumbent government draw up sufficient measures to support the taxi industry.
“It is not a matter we can meddle in. It is what the (current) government and the parliament should handle. I believe the current government should put forward solutions,” Park’s aide told media.
Since last year, the bill has been a political hot potato with critics arguing that it was an “extravagant, populist” scheme to win votes in the presidential election.
Taxi drivers, who have long complained that they are increasingly squeezed by low fares and high fuel prices, have long been lobbying for the bill’s passage. But bus firms fear that if the bill is signed into law, it would put bus operators, already struggling with mounting losses, in the position of having to compete with taxis for government support.
(sshluck@heraldcorp.com)