The Korea Herald

피터빈트

日재계 "韓징용자 소송, 한일 경제관계 훼손 우려"

By 박한나

Published : Nov. 6, 2013 - 17:21

    • Link copied

일본 경제계는 한국인 강제 징용 피해자들에 대한 배상 명령 판결이 한국 법원에서 잇따르는 것과 관련, 6일 "일본 기업을 상대로 한 청구권 문제는 한국에 대한 투자나 사업에 장애가 될 우려가 있고 한국과 일본의 경제관계를 훼손할 가능성이 있어 깊이 우려하고 있다"고 밝혔다.

게이단렌(經團連) 등 일본경제 3단체와 일한경제협회는 이날 '우호적인 한일경제관계의 유지·발전을 향해'라는 입장문에서 "1965년 한일청구권협정에 의해 재산 및 청구권에 관한 문제가 완전하고 최종적으로 해결됐다는 것을 기초로 지금까지 양국 경제 관계가 순조롭게 발전했다"며 이같이 밝혔다.

이어 "경제계는 이 문제를 시급히 해결하고 일한 양국과 양국 경제계가 함께 성장·발전할 수 있도록 양국 정부 및 경제계가 협력해 나가야 한다고 생각한다"고 덧붙였다.

일본 재계가 이날 밝힌 입장은 청구권 협정으로 배상이나 미지급 임금 등 모든 문제가 해결됐다는 일본 정부의 견해와 기본적으로 같은 것으로 징용 피해자 등의 반발이 예상된다.

<관련 영문 기사>

Korea, Japan on collision course over compensation

By Song Sang-ho

Relations between Korea and Japan are likely to further worsen as Japanese companies are poised to ignore Korean courts’ rulings for compensation for wartime forced labor.

Three major Japanese economic organizations were preparing Wednesday for a statement reiterating that all compensation issues were settled under a bilateral normalization pact in 1965.

Japan’s Federation of Economic Organizations, Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Committee for Economic Development are sticking to their stance despite a series of rulings in recent years in favor of Koreans mobilized for forced labor at Japanese firms during the 1910-45 colonial period.

They are calling on the two countries’ governments and business circles to work to promptly address the controversial issue to prevent damage to bilateral investment and trade.

Japanese firms have long maintained that the bilateral deal between the Seoul and Tokyo governments covered individual victims’ right to claim compensation for their forced labor. Seoul believes that the right remains intact as the government-to-government deal does not settle all issues involving victims and private firms.

The statement is expected to further worsen bilateral ties, which have already been frayed due to Tokyo’s repeated claim to sovereignty over South Korea’s islets of Dokdo, and what Seoul sees as its distortion of historical facts and failure to adequately apologize to those forced into sexual servitude during World War II.

Seoul has begun exploring ways, albeit in a low-profile manner, to support the victims as local courts have offered legal grounds to pursue compensation from Japanese firms.

In May last year, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision in favor of nine plaintiffs, who have demanded compensation for their forced labor and mental and physical sufferings from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Nippon Steel Corp.

The top court said that Japanese courts’ hitherto rulings against victims could not be upheld as they were based on the premise that the mobilization for forced labor was legitimate during the colonial period. It stressed that the premise itself conflicted with Korea’s core constitutional values, which see the colonization as illegal.

Following this ruling, appellate courts in Seoul and Busan made decisions in July against two Japanese firms in question and demanded compensation for the plaintiffs.

Experts say should the two firms refuse to make amends, the process to forcibly take properties based in South Korea could proceed, which could deal a considerable blow to bilateral business ties.

According to the Seoul government, the number of Koreans who have reported their experience of forced labor from 2005 to 2008 has topped 220,000. Including their bereaved families, the figure is expected to reach 1 million, observers said.

The right to compensation is inherited by their families when they die. Scholars here claim that the number of Koreans forcibly mobilized by Japan from April 1938 until Korea was liberated in 1945 is around 8 million.

The different interpretations by Seoul and Tokyo of the 1965 deal have long been a diplomatically thorny issue. Many experts here argue that Japan should learn a lesson from Germany in its efforts to make amends to its wartime victims.

The normalization deal came at a time the South was in dire need of economic assistance from outside to spur its development while Japan needed to mend fences with neighboring countries to enhance its post-war status.

(sshluck@heraldcorp.com)