Most Popular
-
1
Dongduk Women’s University halts coeducation talks
-
2
Defense ministry denies special treatment for BTS’ V amid phone use allegations
-
3
Russia sent 'anti-air' missiles to Pyongyang, Yoon's aide says
-
4
OpenAI in talks with Samsung to power AI features, report says
-
5
Two jailed for forcing disabled teens into prostitution
-
6
Trump picks ex-N. Korea policy official as his principal deputy national security adviser
-
7
South Korean military plans to launch new division for future warfare
-
8
Gold bars and cash bundles; authorities confiscate millions from tax dodgers
-
9
Kia EV9 GT marks world debut at LA Motor Show
-
10
Teen smoking, drinking decline, while mental health, dietary habits worsen
NEW YORK (AP) ― With the drama of a summer blockbuster, the dispute over the rights to a film title has turned into a public battle between Harvey Weinstein and Warner Bros.
Disputed is the claim to the title “The Butler,’’ which the Weinstein Co. has promoted as the name of an upcoming drama about a White House butler. An arbitrator last week ruled Warner Bros. has the right to “The Butler,’’ having released a so-named silent short in 1916.
Weinstein, appalled that his potential Oscar bait could be derailed by such an old, inconsequential film, took to “CBS This Morning’’ on Tuesday to claim Warner Bros. has an “ulterior motive’’ in refusing to allow use of the title.
In an interview later with the Associated Press, he claimed that Warner Bros. is using the “Butler’’ dispute to attempt to extort his share of the three-part series “The Hobbit,’’ of which he owns a percentage having developed the “Lord of the Rings’’ trilogy while running Miramax.
“They mentioned that if I gave up ‘The Hobbit,’ they could make the title problem go away,’’ Weinstein said.
The film, directed by Lee Daniels and starring Forrest Whitaker, is to be released Aug. 16. It’s based on the life of White House butler Eugene Allen, whose service extended through decades of U.S. presidents.
Weinstein acknowledged that when he bought the project at the script stage from Sony, “We thought that they had cleared it (the title).’’ He said bargaining between the heads of distribution for Warner Bros. and the Weinstein Co. was moving smoothly “and then all of a sudden it changed.’’
“There’s never been a DVD of it,’’ he said of the 1916 short. “It’s never been on television. What are they protecting?’’
A certain number of Hollywood titles are protected by the Title Registration Bureau, of which the Weinstein Co. and Warner Bros. voluntarily subscribe to, agreeing to be bound by its rules to prevent public confusion over similarly titled films. The registry, a division of the Motion Picture Association of America, mediates any disputes, which are usually resolved quietly with some horse trading.
Warner Bros. re-registered the title in recent years, but has no known plans to use it.
Weinstein is appealing the decision and has enlisted attorney David Boies to represent the company in the matter. He claims possible alternatives like “White House Butler’’ and “Lee Daniels’ Butler’’ are already registered.
“I hope we get a good result,’’ said Weinstein. “If not, we’ll go to court with a restraining order and David will file saying this is anti-competition.’’
Warner Bros. issued a statement Tuesday claiming Weinstein was using the matter to publicize his film “by disseminating deliberate misinformation.’’
Disputed is the claim to the title “The Butler,’’ which the Weinstein Co. has promoted as the name of an upcoming drama about a White House butler. An arbitrator last week ruled Warner Bros. has the right to “The Butler,’’ having released a so-named silent short in 1916.
Weinstein, appalled that his potential Oscar bait could be derailed by such an old, inconsequential film, took to “CBS This Morning’’ on Tuesday to claim Warner Bros. has an “ulterior motive’’ in refusing to allow use of the title.
In an interview later with the Associated Press, he claimed that Warner Bros. is using the “Butler’’ dispute to attempt to extort his share of the three-part series “The Hobbit,’’ of which he owns a percentage having developed the “Lord of the Rings’’ trilogy while running Miramax.
“They mentioned that if I gave up ‘The Hobbit,’ they could make the title problem go away,’’ Weinstein said.
The film, directed by Lee Daniels and starring Forrest Whitaker, is to be released Aug. 16. It’s based on the life of White House butler Eugene Allen, whose service extended through decades of U.S. presidents.
Weinstein acknowledged that when he bought the project at the script stage from Sony, “We thought that they had cleared it (the title).’’ He said bargaining between the heads of distribution for Warner Bros. and the Weinstein Co. was moving smoothly “and then all of a sudden it changed.’’
“There’s never been a DVD of it,’’ he said of the 1916 short. “It’s never been on television. What are they protecting?’’
A certain number of Hollywood titles are protected by the Title Registration Bureau, of which the Weinstein Co. and Warner Bros. voluntarily subscribe to, agreeing to be bound by its rules to prevent public confusion over similarly titled films. The registry, a division of the Motion Picture Association of America, mediates any disputes, which are usually resolved quietly with some horse trading.
Warner Bros. re-registered the title in recent years, but has no known plans to use it.
Weinstein is appealing the decision and has enlisted attorney David Boies to represent the company in the matter. He claims possible alternatives like “White House Butler’’ and “Lee Daniels’ Butler’’ are already registered.
“I hope we get a good result,’’ said Weinstein. “If not, we’ll go to court with a restraining order and David will file saying this is anti-competition.’’
Warner Bros. issued a statement Tuesday claiming Weinstein was using the matter to publicize his film “by disseminating deliberate misinformation.’’
-
Articles by Korea Herald
