Most Popular
-
1
Dongduk Women’s University halts coeducation talks
-
2
Defense ministry denies special treatment for BTS’ V amid phone use allegations
-
3
OpenAI in talks with Samsung to power AI features, report says
-
4
Russia sent 'anti-air' missiles to Pyongyang, Yoon's aide says
-
5
Two jailed for forcing disabled teens into prostitution
-
6
Trump picks ex-N. Korea policy official as his principal deputy national security adviser
-
7
S. Korea not to attend Sado mine memorial: foreign ministry
-
8
South Korean military plans to launch new division for future warfare
-
9
Kia EV9 GT marks world debut at LA Motor Show
-
10
Gold bars and cash bundles; authorities confiscate millions from tax dodgers
The University of Cambridge has retained its premier status in the QS World University Rankings, beating Harvard for a second year, as U.K. and U.S. institutions again took the top 10 spots.
The rankings featured six U.S. establishments, with the remainder coming from Britain. Yale University slipped one place to fourth, while the Massachusetts Institute of Technology rose to third from fifth. The University of Oxford moved up one spot to fifth, ahead of Imperial College London and University College London.
“There’s not much in it but British universities have the edge on international indicators, particularly international faculty, the proportion of staff who are from overseas,” Ben Sowter, head of research for the QS intelligence unit, said in a telephone interview. “It’s a relevant factor.”
Harvard, the world’s richest university, had headed the QS rankings every year from 2004 until last year, when the provider of information to educational establishments stopped compiling the list with Times Higher Education. The U.S. institution took the top spot in the magazine’s own ranking last year.
The QS rankings are an annual league table of the top 600 universities in the world, devised by surveying each institution’s reputation among academics and employers. The respondents are asked how they view each university’s research output. More than 34,000 academics were surveyed this year.
“While university league tables tend to over-simplify the rang of achievements at institutions, it is particularly pleasing to note that the excellence of the transformative research, research that changes people’s lives, carried out at Cambridge is so well regarded by fellow academics worldwide,” Steve Young, senior pro-vice chancellor at Cambridge, said in an e-mailed statement.
Funding changes
Cambridge, the U.K.’s richest university according to a Financial Times report in September, may face pressure on its top ranking as the U.K. government makes changes to higher- education funding, Sowter said.
The government is allowing British universities to treble tuition fees to as much as 9,000 pounds ($14,600) as it tries to reduce state funding to the institutions, part of an austerity drive to cut a budget deficit. If they’ve got less money for research then it will have an impact: on Cambridge’s ranking, Sowter said. “I think you will see a more profound effect on U.K. universities further down the list.”
Good value
Harvard charges overseas students an average of $38,000 to $40,000 a year for a course, while Cambridge charges overseas students $18,000 to $20,000 a year for a course, according to QS research.
“Cambridge in an international comparison still looks good value for money,” Sowter, a University of Nottingham graduate, said.
Canada’s McGill University was the highest placed outside of the U.S. and U.K at 17th, one ahead of Switzerland’s ETH Zurich, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, which retained its 18th spot. The University of Hong Kong was once again the highest ranking Asian university, moving up one spot to 22nd.
The average age of the top 100 institutions has dropped seven years since last year’s rankings, Reflecting the emergence of newer specialist institutions particularly in Asia,” QS said in a statement.
(Bloomberg)
The rankings featured six U.S. establishments, with the remainder coming from Britain. Yale University slipped one place to fourth, while the Massachusetts Institute of Technology rose to third from fifth. The University of Oxford moved up one spot to fifth, ahead of Imperial College London and University College London.
“There’s not much in it but British universities have the edge on international indicators, particularly international faculty, the proportion of staff who are from overseas,” Ben Sowter, head of research for the QS intelligence unit, said in a telephone interview. “It’s a relevant factor.”
Harvard, the world’s richest university, had headed the QS rankings every year from 2004 until last year, when the provider of information to educational establishments stopped compiling the list with Times Higher Education. The U.S. institution took the top spot in the magazine’s own ranking last year.
The QS rankings are an annual league table of the top 600 universities in the world, devised by surveying each institution’s reputation among academics and employers. The respondents are asked how they view each university’s research output. More than 34,000 academics were surveyed this year.
“While university league tables tend to over-simplify the rang of achievements at institutions, it is particularly pleasing to note that the excellence of the transformative research, research that changes people’s lives, carried out at Cambridge is so well regarded by fellow academics worldwide,” Steve Young, senior pro-vice chancellor at Cambridge, said in an e-mailed statement.
Funding changes
Cambridge, the U.K.’s richest university according to a Financial Times report in September, may face pressure on its top ranking as the U.K. government makes changes to higher- education funding, Sowter said.
The government is allowing British universities to treble tuition fees to as much as 9,000 pounds ($14,600) as it tries to reduce state funding to the institutions, part of an austerity drive to cut a budget deficit. If they’ve got less money for research then it will have an impact: on Cambridge’s ranking, Sowter said. “I think you will see a more profound effect on U.K. universities further down the list.”
Good value
Harvard charges overseas students an average of $38,000 to $40,000 a year for a course, while Cambridge charges overseas students $18,000 to $20,000 a year for a course, according to QS research.
“Cambridge in an international comparison still looks good value for money,” Sowter, a University of Nottingham graduate, said.
Canada’s McGill University was the highest placed outside of the U.S. and U.K at 17th, one ahead of Switzerland’s ETH Zurich, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, which retained its 18th spot. The University of Hong Kong was once again the highest ranking Asian university, moving up one spot to 22nd.
The average age of the top 100 institutions has dropped seven years since last year’s rankings, Reflecting the emergence of newer specialist institutions particularly in Asia,” QS said in a statement.
(Bloomberg)
